DEC-008 accepted

Bundle Applications into 'Microsoft Office'

1989-08-01
Authors: billg, steveb

Bundle Applications into 'Microsoft Office'

Setting

Microsoft has successful individual apps: Word, Excel, PowerPoint. Competitors (WordPerfect, Lotus 1-2-3) are strong in specific verticals. Microsoft realizes that business customers use all these tools.

People

  • Responsible: Mike Maples, Bill Gates
  • Approvers:
  • Consulted:
  • Informed:

Alternatives

Option A: Sell Apps Individually (Best-of-Breed)

Pros:

  • Higher margin per unit.
  • Standard industry practice.

Cons:

  • Allows competitors to survive in niches (Lotus in spreadsheets, WordPerfect in writing).

Option B: Bundle as a Suite (Office)

Pros:

  • Massive value proposition ("Get 3 for price of 1.5").
  • Locks out competitors (users won't buy Lotus if they already have Excel in the bundle).
  • Standardizes the UI/UX across apps (common menus).
  • Cross-app integration (OLE).

Cons:

  • Cannibalizes individual sales.
  • Antitrust concerns (bundling).

Decision

Chosen: Option B

Rationale: The "Suite" is the product. By integrating them and discounting the bundle, Microsoft creates an unbeatable moat. It's the "cookie cutter" strategy—once a business standardizes on Office, they never switch.

Consequences

Positive

  • +Office becomes the dominant productivity standard.
  • +Generates massive, recurring revenue.
  • +Kills Lotus and WordPerfect.

Negative

  • Antitrust scrutiny increases.
DEC-008 Authors: billg, steveb