Bundle Applications into 'Microsoft Office'
Setting
Microsoft has successful individual apps: Word, Excel, PowerPoint. Competitors (WordPerfect, Lotus 1-2-3) are strong in specific verticals. Microsoft realizes that business customers use all these tools.
People
- Responsible: Mike Maples, Bill Gates
- Approvers:
- Consulted:
- Informed:
Alternatives
Option A: Sell Apps Individually (Best-of-Breed)
Pros:
- Higher margin per unit.
- Standard industry practice.
Cons:
- Allows competitors to survive in niches (Lotus in spreadsheets, WordPerfect in writing).
Option B: Bundle as a Suite (Office)
Pros:
- Massive value proposition ("Get 3 for price of 1.5").
- Locks out competitors (users won't buy Lotus if they already have Excel in the bundle).
- Standardizes the UI/UX across apps (common menus).
- Cross-app integration (OLE).
Cons:
- Cannibalizes individual sales.
- Antitrust concerns (bundling).
Decision
Chosen: Option B
Rationale: The "Suite" is the product. By integrating them and discounting the bundle, Microsoft creates an unbeatable moat. It's the "cookie cutter" strategy—once a business standardizes on Office, they never switch.
Consequences
Positive
- +Office becomes the dominant productivity standard.
- +Generates massive, recurring revenue.
- +Kills Lotus and WordPerfect.
Negative
- −Antitrust scrutiny increases.